White glove WEEE logistics

helmut.minor • 19. Juni 2022

The myths and the reality of network management.

Throughout many industries, but particularly within the IT and medical equipment industry, the managment of end-of-life equipment includes more than just recycling and disposal. Since a wide range of equipment is installed on a lease or usage basis, those assets need to leave the financial books before they can face their final destiny. Hence, the companies putting such equipment onto the market require field inventory counts with an according standardised documentation. A simple task? Far from it.


The equipment is in most of the cases distributed around multiple countries, needs to be handled in small quantities and is to be disposed of after the value-added service. These requirements lead to a dilemma that companies regularly face: recycling companies are mostly determined to fill their shredding machinery and therefore need high volumes. Accordingly their transportation capacities are dominated by large volume loads. Doing detailed inventory counts and documentation on a small scale does not fit into their organizational setup. On the other side, transportation companies are also frequently laid out for larger volumes. Smaller transportation logistics companies are on the other side often oriented towards parcels or small volume items, but then lack of know-how in the waste sector, not to speak about the lack of licenses or approvals for waste transportation. Furthermore, there is an extremely limited choice of companies in the market that provide this service in all countries by their own organisation. Hence, network management is the requirement of the hour. The choice of appropriate transportation companies and of thoses recycling companies that have specialised departments in smaller WEEE operations - or are even specialized in such kind of WEEE operations - in such a network lead to the ability of a network manager to offer small-scale services at acceptable costs. Furthermore, if the network organisations all follow a standardized service profile, the outcome of each individual service leads to a standard result as generated by one single provider.


It is, however, nearly an art to find small transportation providers, particularly on an international level. Small logistics companies have commonly no sophisticated websites, not speaking of SEO optimization. Therefore the google search does not directly lead to them - and who wants to look up 20 pages down the road for finding a company? Company listings in the so-called "yellow pages" are also not really helpful since they very often lack of an appropriate description of the service levels. At the end it is a mixture of internet search, social media usage, chamber of commerce calls and word of mouth that lead to potential partners. However, even then the tasks are not done with. One might find companies who claim being able or willing to do the service, but it is not enough for the network manager to simply know addresses and send orders across. This applies also to the work with those recycling companies who are prepared to engage in these kind of tasks. Frequently, such WEEE operations are managed by a specialized staff who handle an enormous work load, both in execution and administration.


Network mangement is therefore essentially a communication task and relies heavily on a mixture of both written and verbal communiation and personal involvement. What does that mean and how does envenance deal with this?


Once the order is received for a pick-up, a clear instruction needs to be passed on to the networking partner. We at envenane prefer to communicate directly with the pick-up location before handing over transportation orders to the logistics company. Very often the information between pick-up site and the ultimately responsible customer has been deformed already. The author of this article calls this the "silent post effect". Do you remember the children's game when you whisper a word into one child's ear and then ten childs later a different word comes out? This happens in business also, connected with the fact that listening communication appears to catch only 75 % of the sender's message. Is then writing not the appropriate means of communication? No, a combined effort is necessary. Therefore, we at envenance make sure that the written information is verified and then passed on to the logistics company - again in writing and with verbal explanations. During the pick-up process, our company is available for feedback by telephone and we make sure to check with the pick-up location afterwards that all went well  - and in cases where it didn't we again make sure that we document and implement our learnings.


Now if you think that the heavy part is over, it is still all wrong. Receiving documents from networking partners, having invoice data and getting feedbacks automatically - very often unknown. Why does it take up to two months for receiving a weighing note from a WEEE recycling plant? Due to lack of communication. It is again not enough to write mails - and in respect of the already mentioned work load of the people involved, a pure management follow-up is neither appropriate nor sufficient. Communication processes need to be understood and implemented before the order. Once this is done, a simple phone call can do miracles for both sides.


At the end of the day, the payment procedure is relevant also. Once partners know that they are paid correctly and in time and not systematically after having sent out several reminders, those partners are happy to serve and also go the extra mile. Pushing for performance at no costs is leading to delayed reactions - at best. If you ever wonder about the lack of enthusiasm of partners regarding your orders, maybe take a look at the accounts payables.


Summing up, value-added logistics services for WEEE take-backs require access to a network of small-sized transportation companies with waste approvals and specialized WEEE recycling partners or departments. Managing such a network requires constant and intense communication, both in writing and verbally and along the entire process. People with good international communication skills achieve. A mere e-mail management to an address data base will definitely fail.


If you would like to see international network management at work, challenge us.

von Helmut Minor 21. Oktober 2025
The Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR) , part of the EU’s 2020 Circular Economy Action Plan and the European Green Deal, introduces the DPP to transform how products are tracked and managed across their lifecycle. Its core purpose is to support circular business models by providing accessible, reliable, and standardized data across the value chain. By digitizing lifecycle information, the DPP empowers recyclers with material-specific insights, enables manufacturers to monitor compliance, and helps consumers understand durability, repairability, and sustainability aspects. If implemented effectively, the DPP could become an important tool to drive real change in how products are produced, used, and recovered. But with the growing influence of Omnibus IV , a new question arises: Can the DPP remain a tool for circular innovation as it takes on a growing regulatory role under Omnibus IV? 1. Omnibus IV and the potential change of role of the DPP In a recent webinar, Arianee emphasized the alignment between the DPP and the Omnibus IV simplification initiative. A central proposal is to use the DPP to reduce reporting burdens for manufacturers by streamlining declarations of conformity, customs processes, and data exchange with authorities. The Omnibus IV package , published by the European Commission in May 2025, confirms this trajectory. From a regulatory standpoint, the DPP is becoming a powerful tool for administrative efficiency and digital integration across the Single Market. But this evolution also raises concerns. The DPP was designed to enable circular value creation , not just fulfill compliance obligations. If it becomes primarily a reporting mechanism for regulators, it could undermine its potential to support closed-loop systems, foster reuse, and unlock sustainability innovation. A balanced path is needed. One that aligns regulatory reliability with the practical needs of circular economy stakeholders. While regulatory alignment through Omnibus IV may provide much-needed structure , it risks narrowing the DPP’s functional scope . What qualifies as "compliance data" may fall short of what circular actors need, such as disassembly instructions, component-level material passports, or real-time usage data – and foremost inputs for a circular design of products. 2. Proof of concept: promising, but no common standard yet  A pilot project launched in October 2024 by ecosystem , Fnac-Darty , Beko, Envie and Arianee marks one of the first large-scale implementations of the DPP for household appliances. Over two years, the initiative introduces digital passports built on Arianee’s open-source blockchain infrastructure , assigning each device a unique identity. These passports track lifecycle events, from manufacturing and market entry to repair, resale, and recycling. They also act as digital maintenance logs , consolidating technical specifications, repair history, and environmental impact into one accessible record. Crucially, the project is based on a non-proprietary, interoperable system , allowing data exchange between manufacturers, service providers, and recyclers. It demonstrates that the technology exists and that multi-stakeholder collaboration is possible. Yet a major obstacle remains: there is still no harmonized standard , neither sector-specific nor EU-wide. Without a shared framework, true interoperability remains out of reach. The ambition is clear, but the supporting infrastructure and governance lag behind. 3. Our impressions While the Digital Product Passport holds significant promise, our current impression is that its focus remains limited in several key areas, particularly when it comes to end-of-life processes and industrial usability. Strong emphasis on use phase: The DPP currently seems centered around extending product life, especially through improved repairability and maintenance transparency. However, its potential to support end-of-life processes seem less developed. Designed with the consumer in mind: Much of the DPP’s current design appears geared toward private end users, providing information that helps them repair or understand the sustainability of a product. In contrast, there seems to not be too much focus on industrial users. Questions around data quality and control: Another open issue is the quality of the data entered into the DPP. Since its usefulness depends on accurate and comprehensive input, the question arises: Who validates this information, and how is data quality ensured across different actors and sectors? At this stage, we see a lack of clear governance mechanisms for data verification. A tool for customer engagement, but what about EoL? From the manufacturer's perspective, the DPP seems to offer value primarily as a customer retention tool, for example, through transparent communication about product features and sustainability. However, it remains unclear what incentive manufacturers have to provide detailed and useful end-of-life data, especially if it does not serve their immediate business interests. Looking ahead, several important questions remain unanswered: Can the DPP be scaled to support end-of-life processes at an industrial level? Is it possible for recyclers to extract and interpret high-volume data to improve recycling workflows? Could the DPP support the development of a functioning secondary market for spare parts and recovered materials that is economically viable? In our view, there may currently be more expected of the DPP’s role in end-of-life than it is yet able to deliver. Much will depend on how the system evolves in the coming years—both technically and in terms of regulatory and industry adoption. 4. So, catalyst or casualty? At this stage, the DPP is both : For one it is a catalyst in its intention, design, and pilot implementations . On the other, it is a potential casualty in its institutional framing under Omnibus IV . Whether it fulfills its promise will depend on political will, cross-sector collaboration, and a conscious effort to anchor the DPP in real-world circular value, not just administrative logic. To succeed, the DPP must do more than simplify processes. It must enable circular outcomes. Only if the DPP offers tangible value to both regulators and market actors can it truly fulfill its intended role as a driver of sustainability in Europe’s product economy. And that means putting data, users, and material recovery - not just regulatory compliance - at the center of its evolution.
von helmut.minor 19. August 2025
envenance on compliance. The Triman label has shaped recycling behavior in France over the past three years, increasing awareness and recycling rates. The article highlights those results and gives an outlook to future developments.
von helmut.minor 15. August 2025
envenance on compliance. On 18 August 2025, key changes of the EU Battery Regulation take effect. Our blog outlines changes the readiness of member states.
von helmut.minor 5. August 2025
envenance on compliance. Discover the key European EPR developments of summer 2025, from WEEE Directive evaluation to upcoming Batteries Regulation deadlines and new packaging rules. Learn what these changes mean for producers and how to stay compliant across all three legislations.
von helmut.minor 29. Juli 2025
envenance on compliance. This article explores how Switzerland is finally adopting Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for all packaging. It highlights the regulatory background, environmental context, and the implications of the new VerpV.
von helmut.minor 16. Juli 2025
envenance on compliance. The EU Commission is introducing a harmonized reporting format for waste batteries—a key step in implementing the Batteries Regulation (EU) 2023/1542. This article provides political context, explains the regulatory background, and outlines what businesses need to know now.
von helmut.minor 6. Juli 2025
envenance on compliance. A look at the evaluation of the WEEE Directive 2012/19/EU – and why the time for reform is now
von helmut.minor 17. Juni 2025
envenance on compliance. The secondary IT market is booming — but legal clarity is lagging behind. The author discusses why classifying used IT assets correctly is becoming a key compliance duty for ITAD providers and producers alike.
von helmut.minor 12. Juni 2025
envenance on compliance. The EU’s new Batteries Regulation 2023/1542 redefines battery categories, including key distinctions between portable and industrial types. This article unpacks the regulatory implications, new subcategories, and classification guidance to help ensure compliance.
von helmut.minor 9. Juni 2025
envenance on compliance. The author explores how state-owned packaging PROs could simplify EPR compliance across the EU and highlights administrative trade-offs, digital integration, and the future of centralized reporting.