Growing Demands on Classification in the Secondary IT Market: Compliance Challenges for ITAD Providers and OEMs

helmut.minor • 17. Juni 2025

envenance on compliance.

The Secondary IT Market – A Growth Engine With Legal Risks

The secondary market for used IT equipment has been growing steadily for decades. Now more than ever, companies are under pressure to operate more sustainably while also cutting costs. The reuse and remarketing of decommissioned IT assets offers significant economic and environmental potential, particularly as more and larger data centers are being built across Europe (Bloomberg, 2025)


Specialized service providers – known as ITAD (IT Asset Disposition) companies – typically handle the de-installation, logistics, testing, data erasure, resale, or recycling of such devices. However, these companies, as well as their clients (who are often the manufacturers or producers under Article 3 of the WEEE Directive 2012/19/EU), are increasingly subject to more rigorous compliance expectations.



A New Regulatory Phase: A revised EU Waste Shipment Regulation

On the 20th May 2024, the new EU Waste Shipment Regulation came into force. Its purpose is to prevent the illegal export of waste from the EU and to increase the traceability and control of waste flows within and beyond the Union. It also seeks to promote recycling and reuse by simplifying compliant transport procedures.

“(...) The new Regulation particularly aims to prevent illegal shipment of waste both within the EU and from the EU to third countries. Furthermore, the Regulation targets to increase traceability of waste shipments within the EU and to further facilitation of recycling and re-use.” (EU Commission)

These legal changes are highly relevant for all players in the IT lifecycle – particularly for:

  • ITAD providers handling the physical disposition of assets, and
  • manufacturers/exporters of electronic equipment, who often remain legally responsible under waste and WEEE legislation.



The Waste Status: Often Misunderstood, Always Critical

A key challenge: Is a decommissioned IT asset still an equipment – or has it already become waste? Many providers underestimate how the intent to discard ("Entledigungswille") can define the legal status of a device.

Common Misconceptions:

  • "The customer just wants to stop using the devices – not throw them away."
  • "Only broken devices are considered waste."
  • "Export for reuse is always legal."
  • "Resale turns waste back into a product."
  • "We'll document the classification later."


Under Article 3 No. 1 of the EU Waste Framework Directive, a device is waste if its holder discards it, intends to discard it, or is required to discard it. This makes documented reuse intent essential. In practice, authorities often presume waste status unless proven otherwise. To be noted: The burden of proof lies with the exporter or handler.



Compliance Risks and Shared Responsibility

Correct classification is not only a matter for the ITAD provider – it also involves the equipment owner or the producer  according to Article 3 of the WEEE-Directive 2012/19/EU,  especially when they initiate the asset removal process. If the waste status is misclassified:

  • transport and export may become illegal,
  • authorities may impose heavy fines, and
  • both the ITAD provider and the client company can be held liable.


Within the EU, waste shipments are subject to tiered rules:

  • for disposal or hazardous waste for recovery: prior formal notification to all relevant national authorities is mandatory.
  • For non-hazardous “green-listed” waste within the EU/OECD: general formal information requirements apply upfront and documentation must be available before and during shipment.
  • From 1 January 2025: e-waste exports are prohibited to non-OECD countries, and only allowed to OECD countries under prior informed consent procedures.


These rules implement updates from the Basel Convention, where hazardous e-waste is now classified as A1181 and non-hazardous as Y49.



Enforcement: From Soft Guidance to Hard Controls

From May 2027 onward, EU enforcement will become even stricter. Companies will need to:

  • prove that exported waste is properly treated at the destination facility.
  • commission independent audits of such facilities to verify environmentally sound practices.


Inspections across Member States are being coordinated by networks such as IMPEL, increasing cross-border compliance pressure.



Strategic Takeaway: Classification Is Compliance

Correct classification and documentation of decommissioned electrical and electronic equipment is no longer optional – it's a strategic compliance priority. Both ITAD providers and their enterprise clients must align on:

  • clear internal procedures for waste vs. non-waste assessment,
  • evidenced reuse intent (testing, refurbishment, resale pathway), and
  • robust documentation and transport tracking.


Failing to do so may not only result in legal exposure – but also damage sustainability credibility.


At envenance, we believe that compliance is a driver for trustworthy reuse. Our consultancy expertise, our order management software envialon.myenvenance.com and our international network of recycling partners can be the backbone of your compliant ITAD service.  Let’s build the future of circular IT on this legally secure foundation.


Do your next ITAD project with us.  Contact us.

von helmut.minor 12. Juni 2025
envenance on compliance. The EU’s new Batteries Regulation 2023/1542 redefines battery categories, including key distinctions between portable and industrial types. This article unpacks the regulatory implications, new subcategories, and classification guidance to help ensure compliance.
von helmut.minor 9. Juni 2025
envenance on compliance. The author explores how state-owned packaging PROs could simplify EPR compliance across the EU and highlights administrative trade-offs, digital integration, and the future of centralized reporting.
von helmut.minor 3. Juni 2025
envenance on compliance. This blog explores Washington State's newly enacted Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) law for packaging. It outlines key compliance obligations, exemptions, and deadlines for affected businesses. A must-read for producers navigating multi-state packaging regulations in the U.S.
von helmut.minor 31. Mai 2025
envenance on compliance. As the full implementation of the Batteries Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 is approaching, the author elaborates upon both recent deferral initialtives and upon obligations that will now become mandatory.
von helmut.minor 26. Mai 2025
envenance on compliance. The author gives a brief overview of the essential content of the four Omnibus packages of the EU Commissions and provides links to the original sources.
von helmut.minor 22. Mai 2025
The European Commission’s new Single Market strategy aims to simplify and harmonize Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) rules across the EU—reducing administrative burdens and national inconsistencies for producers of WEEE, packaging, batteries, and textiles. While the vision includes digital labelling, streamlined reporting, and a unified registration system, key implementation questions remain.
von helmut.minor 28. Januar 2025
envenance on compliance. The author gives a brief overview of the Pros and Cons of Bureaucracy reduction regarding EPR regulations and its impact on achieving the sustainability goals of the European Union.
von helmut.minor 22. Januar 2025
envenance on compliance. The author provides an overview of the newly published PPWR and its implications for companies.
von helmut.minor 19. Januar 2025
envenance on compliance. The author gives a country overview of the textile EPR initiatives within the European Union.
von hemut.minor 13. Januar 2025
envenance on compliance. The author gives a brief overview upon the latest details for sorting instructions given by the Portuguese environmental authority.
Weitere Beiträge